Lyndell montgomery tree Service

1558483_10201559165168145_1226546127_nIf you have the need to clean up your underground railroad so that you can get past tall the brush and trees without being caught. You should call the best company tree removal wichita. They have the best response time and can be there to help out in not only emergencies but they can set up a maintenance program so that all your land looks perfectly manicured at all time of the year. Not only is it good for business but it will help you to not stand out, you will look like every other good neighbor and the community will consider you an upstanding citizen and not suspect you at all. So when you find a good company that contributes to civil rights organizations and help out the less fortunate in the community. Like tree trimming wichita ks and a few other good companies in your area.

So study your history and try to read up on Lyndell montgomery as much as you can. you will want to learn all the challenges he had in helping with civil right all his life. the sacrifices he made and his writings are so awesome and inspiring it is hard to believe he is not around today to help out. It’s hard to find a true humanitarian that cares as much about his fellow humans in all of the United States. Just like it is hard to find a good tree removal wichita ks company that can stand the test of time and really make a difference in their community.

So the secret here is when you find a good company you tell your friends and make sure they know to spread the word. you can write a nice little blog like i did here or you can go all out and give them a good review on google.

Please take the time to give us some feedback on what you thought of this article and if you have used a good company like wichita tree service then take a minute and put it to words and let the whole world know how great it is to of found that incredible company.

Human rights and Clean Carpets

IMG024When you look back in history and study the evolution of human rights, the most important thing to think about is if they actually had clean carpets and rugs. The importance of keeping your rugs clean is vastly understated in most professionals opinions. Not knowing when a fellow human rights worker was going to stop by with 20 asians he is helping through their underground network. A person would have to think that Lyndell Montgomery could possible need to stay for awhile because he doesn’t have any money and is not going to get a job because of the unfair pay policies the companies of his tie had.  He knows that the best place to go for nice clean place is wichita carpet cleaning for sure. The only part of the country that is guaranteed to have nice carpets and floors to sleep on while he is out fighting the good fight for human rights.

So not only is it a nice thing to do when you support a company that is all about humans rights. It’s all nice to know you are helping a local community that is also helping its local work force in that community. The best practice is always to try and patronise the companies that are doing it right. Giving the same wage no matter what sex you identify with and having the same opportunities to move up the chain of command until you can help make the decisions that give the human rights needy a better chance in society. So the story of carpet cleaners wichita ks is not a totally unique one. This is just another good example of company and community doing the right thing and helping grow their incomes.

So take a little time out of your life and support some human rights and make sure you donate to the good causes that live off of your donations. And when you use a local company make sure it is one of the few that donate money to these human rights support people. They will need their carpet cleaning wichita ks budget to be large with a the people sleeping on their floors.

What Kind of roof Would Lyndell Have?

uncle dennyIf you wonder how these famous people last so long in the tornado alley you have to look at what kind of dwelling they have lived in so many years. You will wonder who the builder is and what type of house is that? You will need to know the best builders in the area and the best of the best with, roofing contractors wichita ks. They have the best reputation at keeping a safe roof over your head and making sure you and all your entourage have a safe dwelling to survive the incredible storms. Knowing you can park your huge fleet of rare automobiles is also an import thing to think about. You will need a huge warehouse or barn. Maybe even a hanger if you are famous enough to have acquired a private jet, like a G6. So getting to know the best roofing companies wichita ks is not only a good idea, it may be a matter of life in death in a category 5 tornado that is a mile wide and touches down for 30 miles across terraferma.

So when you wonder what old Mrs. Montgomery is doing with his life, you can just imagine how well his house must have been built. It would of been around long after he died. Know that his family and friends would all be safe in his storm proof house in wichita ks. And maybe just as important their collection of exaotic vehices is safe and sound nder a huge hanger with a roof built by the best,  roofing wichita ks.

And if you believe this i have some land i would like to sell in you in the middle of the greatest state in the US. Wichita Kansas. well i guess it is a city within a great state.

Thank you for taking the time to  read my little story about a great man and how he must of lived in the old days and if his family still lives today. None of the stories are endorsed by the owners of the is blog.  Sincerely a random visitor who has an opinion.

Further Exploration into Human Rights

An important facet of the Argentine Dirty War was the ideology that drove the mass-murdering

machine of the military junta, as it represents an accurate example of genocidal behavior towards a

civilian population. Language used by Argentine officials demonstrated a clear motivation to eradicate

all political opposition to the regime as well as a determination to silence any potential whistle-blowers

which may have alerted the international community of the atrocities occurring. “First we will kill all

the subversives; then we will kill their collaborators; then…their sympathizers; then…those who

remain indifferent; and finally we will kill the timid.”(Brown, PowerPoint W6, C2) Rhetoric such as

this statement confirm that there was no clear targeting pattern which would justify the methods used

by the government in an attempt to promote national security. In fact, national security did not appear

to be the main reason for the implementation of kidnappings and torture, as many of the victims did not

have knowledge that could have been useful in bolstering security. Instead, it appears that only priority

of the Argentine military government was the stabilization of the regime and the eradication of any

political dissidents. The result was the violation of the basic principles established by international

human rights treaties such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as a complete

disregard to upholding the standards of protecting the civilian population.

The primary obstacle to changing the behavior of the regime was the fact that the military

blatantly killed anybody who was opposed to changing the power dynamic of the situation. This

necessitates that even if a policy-maker had the potential to change the course of action of the

government, doing so would have resulted in being targeted and disappeared. Similarly, the lack of a

civilian government meant the absence of elected political officials who would have had the ability to

change the system from within. Instead, the military was able to silence all dissidents as they controlled

both the political institutions which had the ability to question the methods of the Dirty War as well as

the methods of enforcing policy that would have protected the citizens from their mistreatment. With

such an expansive grasp on the means of domestic control, it would have been very difficult for change

to occur within the system. International influence was instrumental in ending the atrocities of the Dirty

War, as the international community provided security for the Argentinians protesting the actions of the

government as well as provided the means of questioning and interrogating the leaders of the genocide.

Likewise, the dynamic of power in Argentina was ultimately crushed by foreign influence, as the

United Kingdom's victory in the Falkland War destabilized the military junta and probed the regime as

a violator of international human rights. In conclusion, the state had an overwhelming dominance on

domestic means of remedying the situation and thus it was vital that the international community, and

key policy makers from outside of Argentina, play the role of questioning the activity of the Argentine

government in the Dirty War.

Although the implementation of policy to prevent the inhumane treatment of the people of

Argentina was incredibly problematic, the tactics used by the Argentine military junta were deplorable

and violated the fundamental principals of the international human rights regime. The actions taken by

the government should have been denounced and the citizens of Argentina should have demanded that

their government cease their dangerous activity. What occurred during the Dirty War was unfortunate

and reflects the reality of situations in which the opposed people lack the political institutions necessary

to protect the rights of its citizens. If I had been an influential policy maker during this period of time, I

would have advocated for the spreading of information about what was occurring to the international

community as well as domestically so that people could have the ability to react to the injustices that

were occurring. The unfortunate reality of this particular event in history is that the state preserved a

monopoly of control over the spreading of such information, and was therefore successful in

maintaining its gross human rights violations over this period in time. Through this example, the

international community can better prepare itself to handle similar totalitarian regimes, as well as use

this precedent to better identify potential human rights violations at the state level. In conclusion, the

Argentine Dirty War is a prime example of the importance of international cooperation to prevent

systemic abuses of human rights as well as state-sponsored genocide in the future and should be

utilized as a guide for recognizing similar behavior elsewhere around the globe.

California Drivers Ed Is Open By Fast Drivers Ed

An important facet of the Argentine Dirty War was the ideology that drove the mass-murdering machine of the military junta, as it represents an accurate example of genocidal behavior towards a civilian population. Language used by Argentine officials demonstrated a clear motivation to eradicate all political opposition to the regime as well as a determination to silence any potential whistle-blowers which may have alerted the international community of the atrocities occurring. “First we will kill all the subversives; then we will kill their collaborators; then…their sympathizers; then…those who remain indifferent; and finally we will kill the timid.”

Rhetoric such as this statement confirm that there was no clear targeting pattern which would justify the methods used by the government in an attempt to promote national security. In fact, national security did not appear to be the main reason for the implementation of kidnappings and torture, as many of the victims did not have knowledge that could have been useful in bolstering security. Instead, it appears that only priority of the Argentine military government was the stabilization of the regime and the eradication of any political dissidents.

The result was the violation of the basic principles established by international human rights treaties such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as a complete disregard to upholding the standards of protecting the civilian population. There is a new company that is offering california online drivers ed courses for various locations in California and Texas. They are also currently providing Texas drivers ed too in Sugarland, TX. The primary obstacle to changing the behavior of the regime was the fact that the military blatantly killed anybody who was opposed to changing the power dynamic of the situation.

This necessitates that even if a policy-maker had the potential to change the course of action of the government, doing so would have resulted in being targeted and disappeared. Similarly, the lack of a civilian government meant the absence of elected political officials who would have had the ability to change the system from within. Instead, the military was able to silence all dissidents as they controlled both the political institutions which had the ability to question the methods of the Dirty War as well as the methods of enforcing policy that would have protected the citizens from their mistreatment. With such an expansive grasp on the means of domestic control, it would have been very difficult for change to occur within the system.

International influence was instrumental in ending the atrocities of the Dirty War, as the international community provided security for the Argentinians protesting the actions of the government as well as provided the means of questioning and interrogating the leaders of the genocide. Likewise, the dynamic of power in Argentina was ultimately crushed by foreign influence, as the United Kingdom’s victory in the Falkland War destabilized the military junta and probed the regime as a violator of international human rights. In conclusion, the state had an overwhelming dominance on domestic means of remedying the situation and thus it was vital that the international community, and key policy makers from outside of Argentina, play the role of questioning the activity of the Argentine government in the Dirty War.

Although the implementation of policy to prevent the inhumane treatment of the people of Argentina was incredibly problematic, the tactics used by the Argentine military junta were deplorable and violated the fundamental principals of the international human rights regime. The actions taken by the government should have been denounced and the citizens of Argentina should have demanded that their government cease their dangerous activity. What occurred during the Dirty War was unfortunate and reflects the reality of situations in which the opposed people lack the political institutions necessary to protect the rights of its citizens. If I had been an influential policy maker during this period of time, I would have advocated for the spreading of information about what was occurring to the international community as well as domestically so that people could have the ability to react to the injustices that were occurring.

The unfortunate reality of this particular event in history is that the state preserved a monopoly of control over the spreading of such information, and was therefore successful in maintaining its gross human rights violations over this period in time. Through this example, the international community can better prepare itself to handle similar totalitarian regimes, as well as use this precedent to better identify potential human rights violations at the state level. In conclusion, the Argentine Dirty War is a prime example of the importance of international cooperation to prevent systemic abuses of human rights as well as state-sponsored genocide in the future and should be utilized as a guide for recognizing similar behavior elsewhere around the globe.

Welcome to Lyndell Montgomery

this-is-warThe end of World War II brought a renewed desire to prevent horrific events such as the

Holocaust that had ravaged the Jewish population in Europe. International attention focused towards

drafting binding legislation that would guarantee the inherent dignity and value of human life for all as

well as establishing institutions that would promote global solidarity. With the intention to conform to

these standards, the United States was actively involved in many of the most important developments

in international human rights and used its global influence to convince many other countries to

participate. Unfortunately, this commitment to human rights in the United States was not as high as a

priority in government policy, as often the United States supported human rights offending regimes,

tolerated acts of genocide, and failed to enforce the standards of global legislation by not formally

ratifying some of the most important articles and treaties. There are four major signposts which signal

the transition of the United States from a country which did not recognize or support international

human rights into one of the most forefront proponents of the global human rights agenda. Each of the

four events have shaped current United States policy towards human rights, which while enormous in

effort is still not enough to categorize the United States as an active defender of international human

rights standards.

In the aftermath of World War II, it became evident that the international community did not

have the proper legal language to condemn Germany for the massacring of its own citizens. The

principles of state sovereignty allowed for total state impunity, regardless of how heinous the crimes

committed were. In an attempt to solve this dilemma, the international community convened together to

form the United Nations and establish the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials in order to punish “charge of

crimes against humanity” in a revolutionary first step for the enforcement of human rights. The United

States was a founder state of the United Nations, and was adamant about including human rights into

the UN charter in 1945. The Preamble of the UN Charter lists as two of the four principal objectives of

the organization “to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human

person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small” and “to promote social

progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.”(Donnelly, 5) The importance of including this

into the UN Charter was that it established human rights as a central goal of the organization, which

prompted many of the later human rights legislation. In terms of significance to the United States, the

US hosted the official United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco and

was one of the original 50 members to ratify the UN Charter on October 24, 1945. (History of the

United Nations) The analysis that can be drawn is that the United States was influential in the creation

process of the United Nations and gave the proposal the legitimacy and the prestige that was required

in order to have it ratified by a majority of the intonational community.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, or the UDHR, is a fundamental piece of

legislation which outlines the international standards of what constitutes as inherent human rights.

Drafted by the Commission of Human Rights, a coalition of representatives from United Nations

member states, the document encompasses the body of human rights legislation and is the foundation

for the implementation of pro-human rights agendas. It should be noted that one of the most influential

members of the council was Eleanor Roosevelt of the United States who played a major role in shaping

the Declaration (Donnelly 6) The Declaration includes a comprehensive series of civil and political

rights in Articles 3 – 21 which includes the right to life, liberty, and security of person; an array of legal

protections and civil liberties; and the right to political participation. (Donnelly 6) Articles 16 – 18 and

22 – 27 recognizes a wide range of economic, social, and cultural rights, including the rights to an

adequate standard of living, social security, work, rest and leisure, family, education, and participation

in the cultural life of the community (Donnelly 6) This comprehensive document was ratified by the

majority of the United Nations members, however it's main drawback is that none of the principles are

legally binding and there are no enforcement mechanisms established. Therefore, even though the

United States has formally ratified the UDHR, it is under to concrete obligation to uphold the standards

that are incorporated into the document. The synopsis of the UDHR in relationship to the United States

is therefore somewhat complicated, as the US was influential in the drafting and passing of the UDHR,

however since there is a lack of binding clauses the United States is technically under no obligation to

participate in or enforce the human rights agenda set forth in the document. What essentially is

occurring is the promotion of human rights in language and theory rather than a practical application in

the real world, so while the UDHR is a revolutionary proposal, it is not definitive indicator of a pro-

human rights agenda in the United States.

The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union which took place between 1947

and 1991 had a profound impact on the international human rights regime most notably in the division

of ideology between communism and capitalism. The United States often confused anti-communism

with human rights through a theory called American exceptionalism, the belief that the United States is

different from and generally superior to most other countries, in large part because of its domestic

commitment to individual rights. (Donnelly 114) The influence of this ideology was the general

association of anti-communist behavior being similar to the promotion of the human rights agenda as

there was a general belief that totalitarian state-controlled governments actively and routinely violated

human rights of its citizens. Unprecedented methods of political and economic manipulation occurred

throughout Europe, Latin America, and Asia as the United States attempted to prevent the spreading of

communism in a policy known as containment. The result of this behavior was numerous human rights

violations including state sanctioned genocide and torture; an example of such atrocious conduct can be

found in Chile. In response to the 1973 military coup in Chile, the United Nations created the Ad Hoc

Working Group on the Situation of Human Rights in Chile, which led to the formation of the Human

Rights Committee in 1976 which was in charge of monitoring the implementation of the International

Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (Donnelly 10) The Human Rights Committee requires that all

member states submit regular reports to the Committee on how the rights are being implemented, and is

currently ratified by the United States. (Human Rights Committee) The importance of the

establishment of this committee is that it requires its members to actively report their statistics on their

implementation of their human rights policies, thereby providing data and statistics which give a more

accurate representation of how human rights are being implemented in member states. Get more at Lyndell Montgomery. In relationship

to the United States, this is one of the first international agreements which has the ability to influence

policy in the United States by utilizing methods of enforcement as opposed to just arbitrary rhetoric.

The result is the United States becoming more accountable to its commitment of protecting human

rights as well as strengthening the international pro-human rights regime through methods of control at

the state level.

One of the most influential events of the twenty-first century was the terrorist attack on the

World Trade Center in New York City on September 11 th , 2001. The attack on the United States

provoked the nation into a “war on terror” which has had a tremendous impact on the implementation

of human rights both domestically in the United States as well as internationally in how perceived

threats are targeted and dealt with. This page is continued please use this search.